Serial liar George Santos was tested when a seemingly friendly interviewer grilled the Republican Long Island congressman on his fabrications, at one point asking the freshman lawmaker: “Where do you draw the line between right and wrong?” Pulling?”
They Interview on the conservative One America News Network Caitlin Sinclair asked Santos how the media had treated him, commenting that Congress was “riddled” with deception before zeroing in on Santos’ lies. I
“Where do you draw the line between right and wrong? And as a public office holder, is there a scenario in which you feel it’s okay to lie?” Sinclair asked Santos, 34, in an interview that aired Tuesday.
“No, I don’t think lying is ever unforgivable, period,” Santos replied.
After a few minutes of back and forth, Sinclair told Santos, “You seem angry.” I
“I’m not angry at all. I am,” he replied.
The interview aired as Santos faced criticism for lying about his career, his educational background and his family history.
Earlier Tuesday, Santos announced he would temporarily recuse himself from two House committees investigating his campaign fundraising.
Sinclair initially threw some softball questions at Santos, noting the “deception, corruption, corruption” at the “highest levels” of Congress, asking him to tell his story.
Santos said he came from “shameful beginnings,” growing up in “absolute poverty” in Queens and coming to the conclusion that “people like me shouldn’t do great things in life.”
“And when we do that, it disrupts the system,” he continued. “And I know a lot of people want to make the narrative that I faked my way into Congress, which is absolutely, patently false.”
“I’ve worked hard. I’ve built a career through experience and knowledge and through self-education. And, you know, I think it’s amazing that I get to sit here and get one by the media. It will be discussed again,” Santos said.
Santos admitted in a December interview with The Post that he lied about graduating from Baruch College and working for high-profile Wall Street firms Goldman Sachs and Citigroup. I
Sinclair then sharpened his question. I
“Would you say, or is it a fair statement to say, that the idea that ‘the end justifies the means’ was perhaps a concept that you subscribed to?” he asked Santos. I
“No,” he said.
“I’m just going to say, look, it was a bad decision, a poor decision. I felt the need to do it because I thought that without a diploma I would be looked down upon and looked down upon by other people,” He added.
“As the end goal grew loftier, became one of political ambition, did the exaggeration increase?” Sinclair pressed.
“You have to define exaggeration because there are so many things out there,” Santos replied.
“Where do you draw the line between right and wrong?” he said.
“I don’t think lying is ever excusable, period,” Santos said.
“So what I may have done during the campaign does not reflect what is being done in office,” he explained.
Sinclair tells his subject that Americans are forgiving, but it starts with “a sincere apology.”
“The current opinion is that you haven’t demonstrated that yet.”
“I don’t know what you mean by that, because I have,” Santos told him.
“Well you look angry. You look angry,” he told the congressman.
“I’m not angry at all. I am,” Santos said.
“Are you sorry?” Sinclair pushed.
“I’ve been — I’ve said I’m sorry so many times. I’ve acted like I’m sorry … If you want to compare emotions, people express emotions differently. I’m sorry. Yes. I’m very sorry,” Santos said.
“I don’t know what’s being asked of me when you ask, ‘Oh, you’re not sorry or you don’t feel sorry’. I don’t know what you feel sorry for, Kaitlyn,” Santos said. said
“The perception out there, on the part of your constituents at the moment, is that they have yet to hear a sincere apology from you,” Sinclair replied.
Santos said he has come clean about his education and key details on his resume.
“I don’t know what else to say other than to admit,” he said. “Is there anything more humiliating, humiliating than admitting that on national television, Caitlin?”
Read full article here